Timeline

2022

2021. Hearings in local villages

2021. Hearings in local villages
The parliamentarians organize hearings in local villages across the country.
Hearings are organized by the parliamentarians to give indigenous and tribal groups across the country space to present their position about the second draft of the land rights law and in order to prepare for the public debate. One meeting per indigenous and tribal group takes place, lasting three hours.
Three hours of time was not enough for local communities to understand the “jargon” of the law. This was taken by local stakeholders as disrespect to their right for free prior inform consent. Their discomfort was used by the Government as another argument to delay the public debate about the law.
2022

2020. The second draft law recognizing collective land right

2020. The second draft law recognizing collective land right
The second draft law recognizing collective land right for indigenous and tribal groups is written without the input from indigenous and tribal groups.

 

The second draft became a framework law separating the position of local stakeholders. The content of the second draft in relation to FPIC, demarcation, benefit sharing became separate laws while the first draft integrated these as part of the law and according to the views of indigenous and tribal representatives on these topics.

Since the second version of the law excluded the position of indigenous and tribal representatives, the law has been subject to ample debate and therefore the delay in the final approval of the law.

2022

2019. The first draft law collective rights

2019. The first draft law collective rights
The first draft law collective rights for Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of Suriname is written in collaboration with the indigenous and tribal groups.

 

KAMPOS and VIDS participate, with the Government in the formulation of the first draft of the land rights law including their position on important aspects. The draft was in discussion within the parliament but due to elections, there was not enough time to approve it. The new parliament rejected that first draft and proposed a new version.

The process that led to the first draft of the land rights law was characterized by its participatory approach (although NGO’s were not consulted) and inclusion of local, perspectives, interest and position. So, it has been a disappointment that this version was rejected.

2022

2016. Creation of the Kampos Foundation

2016. Creation of the Kampos Foundation
Leaders from the six different Tribal groups in Suriname organize into the Kampos Foundation (Kwinti, Aluku, Matawai, Paamaka, Okanisi, Saamaka).

 

The six tribal groups of Suriname decide to organize into a foundation in order to create a common approach for the legal recognition of land rights of tribal peoples in Suriname. Also, in that way they could be more effective in National and International lobby and advocacy.

KAMPOS provides the opportunity to all 6 tribal groups to unify their voice in their fight for land rights recognition. Also, under the umbrella of this organization, tribal leaders agree on a common Free Prior and Inform Consent protocol (FPIC).

2022

2015. Protocol of engament

2015. Protocol of engament
VSG and other tribal and indigenous groups in Suriname formulate a community project engagement protocol.

 

VSG and other tribal groups join efforts to develop a Community Engagement protocol providing guidance to the Government of Suriname and outsiders on how to engage local communities in projects. The document is based on International agreements, guidelines and principles for work with indigenous and tribal communities.

This document is important for the Saamaka people because it let them decide for themselves how they want to be engaged in projects. As such, it is also a useful document for the government and outsiders, as it provides the basis for mutual understanding and transparent collaboration.

2022

2013. Territorial demarcation

2013. Territorial demarcation
There is a boundary agreement signed with the neighboring tribes to the Saamaka territory.

 

As part of the implementation of the Saamaka judgement, Saamaka tribe enters in conversation with neighboring tribes to agree on the demarcation of ancestral land. The natural watershed boundaries have been mutually agreed in writing. The Government of Suriname acts as a witness.

The signed document is in the archives of the Ministry of Regional Development. The paper provides evidence that there is no border dispute among Saamaka people, the Matawai and the Okanisi.

2022

2009. Tribal Right Conference

2009. Tribal Right Conference
A Tribal Right Conference was organized by the Government as a space to steer the land rights discussion in Suriname.

 

The Ministry of Regional Development organized a conference on tribal rights with the aim to open a space to make more structural contribution to the land right discussion and enter into action.

 

The discussions did not generate concrete actions and it became more a discussion of the reasons why the land rights should not be legally recognized.

2022

2009. Goldman Prize Award

2009. Goldman Prize Award
Two Saamaka leaders win the Goldman Prize Award.

 

The Goldman Foundation awards the Goldman Environmental Prize to two Saamaka leaders for their achievement protecting the human and social rights of Saamaka people and other Tribal groups throughout the Americas and for protecting more than 90,000 square kilometers of forest against logging by multinationals.

The award placed Saamaka people and their territory on the international map and it helped recognize them as human rights and environmental warriors.

2022

2007. Saamaka Judgement

2007. Saamaka Judgement
The Government of Suriname is obliged by the Inter-American Court on Human Rights to legally recognize traditional land rights to Indigenous and Tribal people of Suriname.

In 2007, the Saamaka won a victory before the IACHR guaranteeing territorial rights not just for the Saamaka, but for all Indigenous and tribal people of Suriname. Also, International jurisprudence has been changed so that free, prior and informed consent is required for major development project throughout the Americas.

For the first time the court ruled that a non- indigenous community like the Saamaka are considered tribal community protected by international law and as such they are entitled to the State’s recognition of their collective de facto rights over land and resources.

2022

2006. The first draft framework law

2006. The first draft framework law
The first draft framework law to legally recognize collective land rights for Indigenous and Tribal people is discussed among indigenous and tribal groups in a meeting in the village of Dritabiki.

A big meeting is organized in the village of Dritabikiby the highest representatives of indigenous and tribal groups of Suriname. The purpose is to discuss the first draft of the land rights law which draft is presented to the Government by the Association of Indigenous Village Leaders (VIDS).

This meeting marked the beginning of the collaboration between indigenous and tribal leaders of Suriname in their fights for land rights recognition. In this meeting, a committee was proposed to peer with the land right commission of the government. The committee did not last because of the lack of financial resources.

2022

2000. Buskondre protocol

2000. Buskondre protocol
The collective rights to land of tribal and indigenous people in Suriname are recognized by presidential decree.

From April 2000 onwards, a presidential decree recognizes the collective rights of indigenous and tribal peoples of Suriname on their respective residential areas as these have been and continue to be known for centuries. Such areas were indicated on maps with geographic coordinates and made available to the respective traditional leaders.

The Saamaka and the Ndyuka, rejected the protocol, because there was not enough consultation with the majority of Indigenous and tribal leaders on the content of this. It was seen as an arbitrary, not transparent and excluding action that did not respect the right to free prior informed consent and self-determination.

2022

2000. The VSG files a petition

2000. The VSG files a petition
The VSG files a petition to the Inter American Commission on Human rights (IACHR) to address human and land rights violation by the Government of Suriname.

The VSG have sought the assistance of the Inter-American Commission on Human rights to make the Government of Suriname stop human and land rights violation due to the granting of logging and mining concessions to multinationals within the Saamaka territory without free prior informed consent.

The IACHR requested the State of Suriname to stop logging in the Saamaka territory (i.e. Precautionary Measure) and to legally recognize Saamaka traditional land rights. The State has not complied with this despite repeated requests from the Commission. This led to a binding decision of the Inter-American Court in favor of the Saamaka people.

2022

1996. Saamaka traditional authorities organize

1996. Saamaka traditional authorities organize
Saamaka traditional authorities organize into the Association of Saamaka Authorities (VSG) to defend their territory from Chinese multinationals pursuing logging in Saamaka lands.

In March 1996 Saamaka traditional leaders representing 77 villages (approximately 35,000 persons) organize into the Association of Saamaka Authorities (VSG) to represent the position of Traditional Saamaka leaders vis a vis the invasion of Chinese logging multinationals in their traditional lands.

This period helped create awareness among the Saamaka people in relation to the importance of the Saamaka as tribal group and about their human and land rights. The VSG managed to mobilize an international network of people and organizations who were key in the Saamaka human rights trial.

 

2022

1993. Logging concession to multinationals

1993.  Logging concession to multinationals
The Government of Suriname grants logging concession to multinationals in Saamaka territory without consulting Saamaka people.

There is an invasion of Chinese multinationals who enter the Saamaka territory with workers in bulldozers and with chainsaws to open up forest areas and harvest timber. Saamaka people were surprised as they did not know of the arrival of the Chinese workers.

Third violation of Saamaka human rights. Agriculture fields were destroyed, forest areas were damaged and drinking water sources were polluted.

2022

1989. The Kourou peace agreement

1989. The Kourou peace agreement
The Kourou peace agreement is signed between the Jungle commando and Government of Suriname ending the armed conflict.

The Kourou Peace agreement was signed by the Government of Suriname and the Jungle Commando on 21st of july 1989 to formally stop the armed conflict and enable refugees in French Guiana to return home. Saamaka settlers from the destroyed villages of Pokigron and Wakibasu returned to their lands and the villages were rebuilt (with poor government support).

The National Army claimed to step out of the war acknowledging the peace agreement but invisibly promoted paramilitarism among indigenous and tribal groups to continue fighting the Jungle Commando. Through those actions, they objected the Kourou agreement as they wanted to continue the political and military control of the hinterland.

 

2022

1986-1991. Armed conflict

1986-1991. Armed conflict
Armed conflict between Jungle Commando (guerrilla) and the National Army.

The armed conflict lasted from 1986 to 1991. The war revolved around control of eastern Suriname and other areas which were used as cocaine trade hubs. In the period 1986-1989 the fighting was heaviest.

Two Saamaka villages, Pokigron and Wakibasu were burnt down and physical infrastructure (e.g. roads, bridges, government buildings) was destroyed The war impacted Saamaka culture because the position of the Saamaka authorities weakened as the guerilla did not acknowledge these authorities and only they, guns holders, were to be obeyed.

 

2022

1979. First open gold concession

1979. First open gold concession
First open gold concession within Saamaka territory granted to the State owned gold mining company Grasshopper Aluminum Company (Grassalco).

Gold deposits were discovered within Saamaka territory in the area known as Rosebel. There were no environmental nor social assessment required at that time. After signing the mining agreement with the international mining company, exploration and exploitation begun.

Second violation of Saamaka human rights, not only because Saamaka land was grabbed (for the second time) but also because there was no due Free Prior Informed Consent. The Saamaka territory overlapping that concession becomes the largest gold producer of Suriname while the communities do not receive compensation from the exploitation.

2022

1961-1964. Construction of the Afobaka Dam.

1961-1964. Construction of the Afobaka Dam.
Mr. Prof. Ir. Van Blommenstein engineers and directs the construction of the Afobaka Dam.

The construction started in 1961 and was finished in 1964. About 75% of the generated energy was used for aluminum production and the rest is consumed in Paramaribo.

First violation of Saamaka human rights. An area of 156,000 hectares was flooded and about 9,000 Saamakans were displaced from their traditional lands. Displaced clans were pushed into the territory of others, stressing jungle resources, internal disputes and forcing more migration.

 

2022

1958. Hydrodam project

1958. Hydrodam project
The Government of Suriname approves the Afobaka hydrodam project.

Suralco (Suriname Aluminum Company) received permission of the Surinamese Government to construct a hydrodam project (i.e. Afobaka dam) to supply power to the Aluminum smelter. The Afobaka dam is located in the Upper-Suriname river in the District of Brokopondo.

Generation of 180 megawatt electricity from the powerhouse to run the Aluminum plant and to supply electricity to Paramaribo. Until today (2022) part of the Saamaka people downstream have no electricity from the hydrodam while they were directly and largely impacted by its construction.

2022

1863. Abolition of slavery

1863. Abolition of slavery
King Willem III of the Netherlands abolished Slavery in Suriname and in all the Dutch colonies.

About 32,911 afro-descendent people were freed from slavery in Suriname. It was not freedom because after the abolition of slavery on 1 July 1863, they were obliged to continue to work on the plantations for 10 more years until 1 July 1873.

The liberated were allowed to choose whom they wanted to work for and they received a very low wage. They were only allowed to move with permission of the colonial and planter authorities. If they could not prove that they had a job, they were imprisoned.

2022

1762. Freedom from slavery

1762. Freedom from slavery
Signed peace treaty with the Dutch Colonizers which allowed Saamaka who had successfully freed themselves from slavery to legally be free and stay in their territory.

The Saamaka fought against the Dutch colonial army in order to obtain freedom from slavery. Once they obtained their freedom, they started families with the freed women. The free Saamakans organized themselves to share land and resources (this marked the beginning of their internal governance system).

The peace treaty gave Saamaka people and other tribal groups in Suriname, autonomy as a tribal group and marked the beginning of traditional land ownership.